Country Report Botswana March 2011

Economic policy: The 2011 budget is presented to parliament

The minister of finance and development planning, Kenneth Matambo, presented the budget for fiscal year 2011/12 (April-March) on February 7th. Opposition parties were quick to criticise the speech as "more of the same", but there were significant differences in both style and substance from previous years. Notably, the 2011 budget speech was much shorter, focusing on key themes and accompanied by a wider range of documents, as well as an invitation for feedback through the ministry's website. This is the result of ongoing efforts to improve transparency and accountability in the budgeting process, which, in turn, is part of a programme of reforms to financial management in the public sector that is being supported by the World Bank, among other partners. Related to this, Mr Matambo indicated that a new Public Finance Management Bill, intended to replace the existing Finance and Audit Act, would be tabled before parliament shortly.

Government finances
(P bn, fiscal years Apr-Mar)
 2008/92009/102010/112011/12% change
 OutturnOutturnEstimatedBudget2011/12 on 2010/11
Revenue & grants30.530.030.334.112.6
 Tax revenue20.520.019.523.319.6
  Mineral tax3.52.42.73.320.5
  SACU customs pool7.87.96.08.540.9
  Non-mineral income tax4.65.65.86.03.3
  VAT4.43.94.75.312.5
  Other taxes0.30.30.30.313.2
 Non-tax revenue9.49.210.310.51.9
  Mineral royalties & dividends6.76.76.67.920.0
  Sale of property0.10.11.10.1-93.2
  Other non-tax revenue2.52.42.62.5-2.5
 Grants0.60.80.50.3-40.4
Expenditure & net lending35.239.540.541.01.3
 Recurrent23.925.727.230.311.5
  Personal emoluments8.79.311.911.6-2.6
  Other charges14.916.114.818.222.8
  Public debt interest0.30.40.50.611.4
 Development11.513.013.310.8-19.1
 Net lending-0.20.80.0-0.1248.1
Balance-4.7-9.5-10.2-6.9-32.2
Source: Ministry of Finance and Development Planning.

Download the numbers in Excel

© 2011 The Economist lntelligence Unit Ltd. All rights reserved
Whilst every effort has been taken to verify the accuracy of this information, The Economist lntelligence Unit Ltd. cannot accept any responsibility or liability for reliance by any person on this information
IMPRINT